Thursday, December 1, 2016

Outside Expereince - UMOCA - Sehnsucht

Cara Krebb’s Sehnsucht: Portals to the Unattainable
I spent my childhood in a modest white house in northern Germany. I loved my home. I loved the gleaming stone floor. I loved the curving staircase, adorned with decorative wrought iron. I loved the narrow hallways. Best of all was the attic. It was accessed by a small sliding door tucked behind a large wardrobe. It was my secret place. It was my own world full of wonder and excitement.
Fifteen years later, I was riding a train to Salt Lake City reminiscing about the trains I used to take through Europe. For a moment my home wasn’t so distant. I longed. I ached. I hoped for that place again. Sadly, I realized even if I were to return, even if I were to prance across that polished stone floor, climb the twisted stairs, and open the sliding door once more, the attic wouldn’t be the same. That place was partially the physical locale, but mostly the imaginings of an seven-year-old girl. That state of naivety of youth and wonder at the mundane could never be reclaimed, yet I still ached for it.
There is a word that Germans use for this immense desire for the unreachable or “the inconsolable longing in the human heart for we know not what; a yearning for a far, familiar, non-earthly, intangible land one can identify as one’s home.” Sehnsucht.
That beautiful familiar word from my German home greeted me as I walked into an exhibit at the Utah Museum of Contemporary Art. It was the title of an exhibit located in a far corner of the museum. The entrance was only discernable from a certain vantage point. I felt like I was once again creeping around the corner and entering into my attic to fulfill a childlike instinct to explore. As I crossed the threshold, I entered a new world created by Cara Krebbs.
The space was filled with white noise and an overtone of delicate tinkling glass. It echoed off the white walls of the small rectangular enclosure. The soft rhythmic soundscape receded as it dissipated into familiarity. Welcoming its visitors to the intimate space was an array of tropical ocean blue gelatin. Made from circular molds, they were each unique in form and displayed on a scaffolding of ornate silver stands.
On the walls of the gallery were what seemed to be large dabs of amorphous slimy gloop. It felt as if they were moving and undulating, although the paint and glass they were made from were undeniably rigid. These frozen amebas inhabited the realm somewhere between painting and sculpture. They were wall mounted, evoking the conventions of traditional painting, yet extended into the viewer's space anywhere from two to six inches: growing and receding into hills and valleys of a transparent landscape. The glass encapsulated a painted paradisiacal world. Shadows and impressions of palm trees, clear waters, tropical fish, and lush forests were illuminated and at the same time morphed by the refraction of light through curved glass.
On the far side of the exhibit, was an intimate closet-like space.  Above was found the source of the rhythmic tinkling: a clever apparatus erected to shine light through moving water. The result: twisted and bended light made the walls move. In the center of the space, a large square flat pedestal laid on the floor. The scale of the pedestal was uncomfortably large for the space and dwarfed a small clear balloon resembling a pool-floatie. Lulling waves of light glistened across the plastic and illuminated a landscape printed on the backside. As quickly as the excitement and wonder of this new world came, it left and was replaced with immense sorrow as I realized I could never reach that destination, in the same way I could never return to the idealized attic of my german home.
Krebb’s pieces are portals. Just as the train careening down its tracks had the capacity to carry me from one space to another, miles and miles apart, the transparent artifacts of this exhibit are another form of transportation. Like Lewis Carroll's Looking Glass, they reveal a mystical unexplored world. Lewis Carroll’s portal to another world may also be referenced by the sweets arranged on silver platters; they recall Alice’s encounter with goodies labeled “eat me” and “drink me”. However, Krebb’s portals, instead of depositing you at your destination, force you to stay boarded on the train. The viewer remains somewhere between worlds, frozen in limbo. A sense of suspended time is also created by the soundscape’s repetitive nature. The music never moves forward or backward, but remains in the same place like a broken record.
Welcoming invitations followed by boundaries are patterns are found throughout Krebb’s exhibit. This is first exemplified by the pristine aqua jellos. They were presented with so much care and decadence, as if to welcome a guest. The viewer is enticed by the jewel-like gleaming mounds of gelatine. The boundary presents itself in the form of context; because of the gelatines location within an exhibit, the viewer knows it is art, and thereby not meant to be touched or consumed. The glass amorphous paintings are also very enticing. Their transparent nature invites the viewer to look and search for what lies within. The elusiveness of the medium is also an invitation to touch or even squeeze to discover its true material properties.  There is a desire to touch, yet it cannot be touched because of museum etiquette and the physical boundary of rigid glass. What looks like it must give like putty would not acquiesce. These boundaries are essential because they contribute to the sense of sehnsucht Krebb is trying to portray. The viewer cannot be permitted to enter the ideal imagined space because it would destroy the sense of longing. One does not miss or long for something they have complete access too.
Lastly, fluidity and transience are prevalent in this exhibit. The illusion of movement found in refracted light and the amorphous forms of Krebb’s paintings are a reminder of the slippery nature of memory and imagination. They describe the difficulty of grasping at a dreamland memory as it dribbles and dissipates like water through cupped fingers. The transparent materials, aqua colors, refracted light through water and glass, and subject of many of the landscapes make allusions to the ocean: mysterious, unexplored, and in constant motion. Fluidity is also presented in the form of art pieces that bridge the borders between painting and sculpture, the everyday mundane and art, and reality and imagination.

Krebb’s exhibit, has the tremendous ability to take one through the full range of the word sehnsucht. Like an opera, it guides you through a myriad of emotion, all the while telling a singular dramatic story. One feels excitement and awe as they witness the wonderful places that Krebb’s portals reveal to us. This is followed by a tremendous load of longing, or missing. Then finally sorrow, upon realizing these utopias are out of reach and unattainable. Although sehnsucht has no comparable english translation, it is through Krebb’s exhibit that one can come to an understanding of the word that transcends speech.














Carrie Mae Weems ART 21 presentation

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UqYXwc_1PKxUYjE6z-mxuXo1rNE3KmM6SbNO5NuT7nE/edit?usp=sharing

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Carrie Mae Weems - Ideas on Gender and Feminism




“Proper” representation of women.


https://medium.com/@sailorhg/coding-like-a-girl-595b90791cce#.n9gmudjv2



Weems mentions a "war". What war is she talking about?
What is an ideal woman or man? What traits, attributes, professions, etc. do they have?
What is Femininity / Masculinity?
Where do ideas of gender roles and ideals come from?
Is there any truth or validity to the social constructs of gender?
Is it okay to subscribe to traditional binary roles of male/female?
Weems says that her "Kitchen Table Series" helped her discover what she could do within her own space to create a difference. What can you do with your own space to address this issue?

For my response to Weems work, I created a sound collage. Here's the link to it. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/86vjzjgw49hwc4d/WhoIsWoman_mixdown.mp3?dl=0

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Who are Cornell West and Bell Hooks and Michel Foucault? What do they have to say about postmodernity, deconstruction, and race?

Cornel West


  • What is it to be Human? - we are all on our way to death, no matter what level of social status we are. The question is "what type of person are you going to be on that short journey from your mothers womb to your tombstone?"
  • In his book 'Race Matters' Cornel states his purpose: “…my basic aim in life: to speak the truth to power with love so that the quality of everyday life for ordinary people is enhanced and white supremacy is stripped of its authority and legitimacy."
  • Black Americans should use their common history as a source of power, hope, and help.
  • Black Americans must create new leadership that are in touch with the people.
  • "Nihilism is not overcome by arguments or analyses; it is tamed by love and care...a love ethic must be at the center of politics and conversation". A love of self and others must be the purpose of any economic or political action - West argues that this is the solution the rage and hopelessness of black America.
Bell Hooks


  • Relating theoretical paradigms through examples in popular culture
  • Using popular culture as pedagogy
  • Thinking critically about our lives, despite being underprivileged, gives power.
  • Addresses the problem that underclass, black youth don't have the same sense of entitlement that white students in ivy league schools do. Their trajectory is not based on intelligence, but rather on their sense of entitlement. 


Michel Foucault


  • Philosophical historian: looks back into the past to solve and sort the problems of the present. 
  • Criticizes the evolution of academics, medicine, sexuality, politics etc. 
  • We have been taught that we are making progression from the past, but Foucault said that we should break away from the optimistic and privileged way we view life in the present, and consider that the way things were done in the past might actually be superior. He encourages one to look at the dominate institutions of our time and question them by analyzing their history and evolution. 

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Art and Design



ART

DESIGN
Doesn’t need to be explained, or can’t be explained.

Explains itself
Functionless

Specially crafted to fulfill a specific purpose or function.
Concept - abstract ideas

Selling nothing

Selling something
Would have you ask questions, rather than answer questions

Relays messages clearly and concisely
Intended by its creator to be art
Intent of the creator
Intended by its creator to be design
To the audience, it is art
Perception of the viewer
To the audience, it is design
Hanging in a museum
Context
On shelves, in advertisements, illustrating a book, etc.
Original
Production
Mass produced
Many interpretations

One interpretation
Abstract ideas and concepts

Physical or Tangible object
Process

Product

As I look over this list that I’ve made, I think that is one of the interesting parts of postmodernism is the lack of distinction between art and design. As I review the classifications that I’ve created for each discipline, I find myself making arguments of how the reverse could be true as well. The boundaries between these two practices are increasingly being blurred.

Take for example Andy Warhol’s Brillo box. In the context of a convenience store, it would be design: created with the intent to sell or market. Specially crafted for a specific purpose to contain the product, as well as appeal to potential customers. Remove the Brillo box from the shelves of a grocery store and place it on pedestal in a museum and it is transformed from a simple Brillo box, into an idea. The viewer begins to ask questions about the object. Or perhaps girl riffling through a fashion magazine is intrigued by the color, form, patterns, and textures on an advertisement. She clips it from its bound pages and tapes it to her wall to be displayed. As soon as it is placed on the wall, and there is sentimentality and importance attached it moves into the realm of art.

The context of an object may be the determinant of what constitues art vs. design. 

I also wonder if the distinction between art and design is just an arbitrary line to separate low culture and high culture. I believe that art and design can coexist and are not separate entities. I am intrigued by the work of Andrea Zittel, who bridges the gap between art and design. Her purpose for designing her clothing, living space, shelving, small camping modules etc. is for the means of creating an experience, which could be considered an artistic concept.